EO 14166: Application Of Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act To TikTok

Executive Orders

TLDR

This executive order temporarily halts the enforcement of Congress’s TikTok ban for 75 days (until April 5, 2025), grants immunity for previous violations, and claims exclusive federal authority for enforcement. The order argues that the previous administration’s last-minute timing necessitates review, while preventing disruption to 170 million U.S. users. This action tests constitutional boundaries regarding presidential powers and may face legal challenges.

This executive order pauses enforcement of the TikTok ban enacted by Congress one day before President Trump’s inauguration, citing national security review needs. Below is the analysis:

Core Provisions

  1. 75-Day Enforcement Moratorium: Directs the Attorney General to halt all enforcement of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act until April 5, 2025
  2. Retroactive Immunity: Prohibits penalties for any violations occurring between the law’s January 19, 2025 effective date and the order’s signing
  3. Federal Preemption: Claims exclusive federal enforcement authority, blocking states/private parties from acting under the law

Key Rationales

  • Transition Timing: Argues the previous administration “boxed in” the new presidency by making the ban effective January 19 - one day before inauguration
  • Operational Continuity: Seeks to prevent “abrupt shutdown” of TikTok’s U.S. operations impacting 170 million users during review
  • Mitigation Evaluation: Requires time to assess whether ByteDance/TikTok’s existing safeguards adequately address data privacy/foreign influence concerns

Constitutional Considerations

1. Enforcement Discretion: While presidents have prosecutorial discretion, this blanket moratorium on congressionally mandated action tests those boundaries. The Supreme Court has previously limited such delays when agencies disregard statutory deadlines (Norton v. SUWA).

2. Federalism Clash: The order’s attempt to block state enforcement conflicts with the Act’s lack of explicit preemption language. This could face challenges under the anti-commandeering doctrine (Murphy v. NCAA).

3. Retroactive Immunity: Granting immunity for past violations raises nondelegation concerns, as Congress didn’t authorize such waiver authority in the original statute.

Practical Implications

  • Negotiation Leverage: Creates a 75-day window for TikTok to negotiate a sale/restructuring that satisfies national security concerns
  • Market Uncertainty: App stores and ISPs face conflicting guidance about compliance during the moratorium period
  • Precedent Risk: Establishes a model for incoming administrations to freeze outgoing administrations’ last-minute regulations

This order represents an aggressive assertion of executive authority over congressionally mandated national security measures, with legal viability hinging on courts’ interpretation of enforcement discretion boundaries. The administration’s next steps regarding TikTok’s operational status before April 5 will determine whether this delay tactic evolves into permanent policy change.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Policy. The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (the “Act”) (Pub. L. 118-50, div. H) regulates “foreign adversary controlled applications,” specifically those operated by TikTok and any other subsidiary of its China-based parent company, ByteDance Ltd., on national security grounds.

Section 2(a) of the Act prohibits entities from distributing, maintaining, or updating certain defined foreign adversary controlled applications within the territory of the United States by providing (A) services for such distribution, maintenance, or updates by means of an online mobile application store or other marketplace; or (B) internet hosting services to enable the distribution, maintenance, or updating of such applications. Section 2(g) of the Act defines “Foreign Adversary Controlled Application” to include websites, desktop applications, mobile applications, and augmented or immersive technology applications operated directly or indirectly by ByteDance Ltd. or TikTok. Under section 2(a) of the Act, the prohibitions of the Act with respect to these entities became effective on January 19, 2025.

I have the unique constitutional responsibility for the national security of the United States, the conduct of foreign policy, and other vital executive functions. To fulfill those responsibilities, I intend to consult with my advisors, including the heads of relevant departments and agencies on the national security concerns posed by TikTok, and to pursue a resolution that protects national security while saving a platform used by 170 million Americans. My Administration must also review sensitive intelligence related to those concerns and evaluate the sufficiency of mitigation measures TikTok has taken to date.

The unfortunate timing of section 2(a) of the Act — one day before I took office as the 47th President of the United States — interferes with my ability to assess the national security and foreign policy implications of the Act’s prohibitions before they take effect. This timing also interferes with my ability to negotiate a resolution to avoid an abrupt shutdown of the TikTok platform while addressing national security concerns. Accordingly, I am instructing the Attorney General not to take any action to enforce the Act for a period of 75 days from today to allow my Administration an opportunity to determine the appropriate course forward in an orderly way that protects national security while avoiding an abrupt shutdown of a communications platform used by millions of Americans.

Sec. 2.

Action.

(a) I hereby order the Attorney General not to take any action on behalf of the United States to enforce the Act for 75 days from the date of this order, to permit my Administration an opportunity to determine the appropriate course of action with respect to TikTok. During this period, the Department of Justice shall take no action to enforce the Act or impose any penalties against any entity for any noncompliance with the Act, including for distributing, maintaining, or updating (or enabling the distribution, maintenance, or updating) of any foreign adversary controlled application as defined in the Act. In light of this direction, even after the expiration of the above-specified period, the Department of Justice shall not take any action to enforce the Act or impose any penalties against any entity for any conduct that occurred during the above-specified period or any period prior to the issuance of this order, including the period of time from January 19, 2025, to the signing of this order.

(b) The Attorney General shall take all appropriate action to issue written guidance to implement the provisions of subsection (a).

© I further order the Attorney General to issue a letter to each provider stating that there has been no violation of the statute and that there is no liability for any conduct that occurred during the above-specified period, as well as for any conduct from the effective date of the Act until the issuance of this Executive Order.

(d) Because of the national security interests at stake and because section 2(d) of the Act vests authority for investigations and enforcement of the Act only in the Attorney General, attempted enforcement by the States or private parties represents an encroachment on the powers of the Executive. The Attorney General shall exercise all available authority to preserve and defend the Executive’s exclusive authority to enforce the Act.

Sec. 3.

General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

© This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

January 20, 2025.